Obviously the Alliance cannot take over the Horde -- from a game play standpoint, it simply cannot happen. You cannot wipe out half your playerbase and suddenly create one giant group of united races when your stance for the past ten years has been one of duality. So how, exactly, does the Alliance claim victory in this situation? This is the issue that has concerned Alliance players all along, and the lack of a really cohesive, compelling Alliance storyline to run in counterpoint with the Horde has only highlighted the reasons for concern.
I've pointed out before that the Alliance didn't really need a reason to attack Orgrimmar, but the Horde absolutely needed one for it to be a valid raid instance. This is why we've seen so much Horde story all expansion -- the actions of the Horde and the Horde rebels have to be justfied and feasible in order for that raid to take place. But the unfortunate side effect of all of this has been a lackluster story on the Alliance end of things -- a halfhearted attempt to make the faction look strong. Yes, the Alliance already had motivation to attack Orgrimmar,
world of warcraft gold, but what exactly was motivating them through the rest of the expansion?
It's left a gap in the storyline, a gaping chasm that has yet to be filled with any real story. For all the tales of how wonderful a king Varian Wrynn happens to be, we've barely seen any evidence of it. For all the tales of Alliance triumph, we've yet to see any major examples of that triumph. And because of the nature of the Alliance and Horde dynamic in game play,
cheap wow gold, whatever moment the Alliance gets at the end of the Siege of Orgrimmar runs the risk of not feeling like a real victory.
相关的主题文章：
http://stabilitate.com/wealthandhealth/does-it-help-you/ http://www.mesurveillance.com/plus/view.php?aid=402556
Chat Sentinela
