Hunt said that they would, and that politicians had actually told him this. Bryant said he did not accept this.I simply believe his comments there to be untrue. I do not believe that members of this House or the other House want to control the press. That should never be our business. I think he's making that up and I think he should withdraw the comment. I note that he's gone native, because he's already using unattributed comments [which is what newspapers do].? Bryant said the Press Complaints Commission needed to be replaced with a completely new body. It should be established by statute, so that it has the "teeth" it needs to enforce decisions, he said. But it should be independent of government and the newspaper industry.
Clegg has also complained about the bill being misrepresented. Taken together, their comments suggest that Labour's propaganda campaign against the bill has been effective. (See 12.39pm.)? Danny Alexander, the chief secretary to the Treasury, has said that the Lib Dems would like to take people on the minimum wage out of income tax altogether. In a Q&A, he indicated that this would be a promise in the next Lib Dem manifesto. He also dismissed comments from unnamed Lib Dem sources quotes in the Times complaining he has "gone native" in the Treasury. (See 9.52am and 10.24am.)? Brian Paddick has urged Lib Dem activists not to write off his chances of winning the London mayoral election.
We can get the partly state-owned banks to lend more: we have done a bit of that and must do more, but we are then up against EU competition rules.We can also try to mobilise some new sources of funding – supplier finance from big companies; business angels and venture capital; pension funds and insurance companies all this has already been happening, but will move faster with government support.The bit about "lending on an even bigger scale" was particularly interesting because this is what George Osborne is doing through credit easing.Cable was also quite defeatist on the subject of executive pay.I don't pretend for a moment that more shareholder power – desirable though that is – will do more than scratch the surface of the inequalities of income and wealth,
kate spade outlet, and the justified sense of social injustice which has grown in the last few decades of boom and bust.
But, as with much else in life, there will be an upside to progress, also a downside.It's understandable that some women are impatient about the pace of change and about persistently chauvinistic attitudes among men. We see plenty of evidence of that, don't we, though older blokes know that older feminists sometimes give the impression that some of the younger sisters are crybabies who don't know how lucky they are.But feminist impatience is a manifestation of growing success, a revolution of rising expectations.Myself, I cheerfully plead guilty to a bubbling trickle of politically incorrect thoughts (it can be such fun, like making jokes about Stalin in the old USSR),
www.cnnhkids.com, though that doesn't make me a loutish Jeremy Clarkson petrolhead, nor put me in the predatory "Uncle Jimmy" Savile camp either.
As such, he deserves some credit.Perhaps he should have become party leader after Charles Kennedy stepped down in 2006. But it was Cable who had wielded the knife over Kennedy and, as is often the way, the party looked elsewhere. It opted for an even older man, nice Sir Ming Campbell who was nearly 65 at the time – to Cable's nearly 63. In 2006 Smith turned 69.It was inevitable with all these bus-pass holders on stage that when Campbell fell in October 2007 (Cable had made unhelpful remarks on the BBC) the Lib Dems swung towards the more youthful Clegg (then 40). He beat Chris Huhne (at least he did until the postal votes were counted) as well as the party's much loved also-ran, Simon Hughes MP.
I think he meant to make the point that Lib Dem members were not afraid to criticise the party leadership,
ytcgzx, but the way he phrased it it sounded as if he was attacking Oakeshott for opposing the tycoon tax out of self-interest (which I don't think anyone believes to be the case).12.34pm: Clegg is winding up now.I may be Deputy Prime Minister but let me tell you: I am as much of a radical as ever.Jo Grimond decried the conservatives of all parties, those who he said showed a 'sentiment in favour of things as they are':Things as they are means an economy for executives not ordinary workersThings as they are means a bank system that bankrupts our economyThings as they are means life chances being crushed by the fortunes of birthThings as they are means a tax system that hurts ordinary working familiesThings are they are means a House of Lords stuffed with machine politiciansThings as they are means political parties kow-towing to media mogulsThings as they are just won't do any moreAnd we are in politics to change them.
But sometimes they make the wrong choices. He mentions Alan Walters opposing Britain's decision to joint the Exchange Rate Mechanism and John Maynard Keynes opposing Churchill's decision to rejoin the Gold Standard in 1925.Balls has been saying recently that just because the consensus backs George Osborne, that does not mean that Osborne and the consensus are right. Balls seems to be identifying himself with Walters and Keynes.10.16am: Balls says Osborne had a key decision to make when he became chancellor. He could have followed Labour's defict reduction plan. But he chose not to.Balls says that he thinks Osborne was motivated by politics, not economics.I was - and remain - deeply suspicious that he was using the imperative of deficit reduction as convenient cover to drive through a deeply ideological programme of cuts to public services and the welfare state.
Chat Sentinela
